
Deal Reflects Bipartisan Commitment to Strategic Investments in Diplomacy and International Assistance
Fresh off a two-week holiday recess, Congress returned to Washington with a looming January 30th deadline to finalize FY26 spending and avoid another government shutdown. In a culmination of months of difficult negotiations, Congressional Appropriators released the text of a bipartisan, bicameral agreement on a final FY26 National Security, State Department, and Related Programs (NSRP) Appropriations bill.
While no compromise is perfect and additional needs remain to advance American interests abroad, the agreement is significant. It rejects major cuts to diplomacy and U.S. international assistance tools – instead providing a 16% overall reduction while preserving critical programs, enhancing oversight and transparency, and reasserting Congress’s role over spending.
Adding in funding for international food assistance provided through the final FY26 Agriculture Appropriations bill and the small amount of funding for international programs provided through the final FY26 Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill, the FY26 International Affairs Budget receives a total of $51.3 billion. This represents a $9.8 billion (-16%) cut compared to the FY25 enacted level but is $20.4 billion (+66%) above the Administration’s FY26 request.
| FY25 Enacted** | FY26 Request*** | FY26 House | FY26 Conference | |
| Non-Emergency | $58.6 billion | $31.0 billion | $47.2 billion | $51.3 billion |
| Base Emergency | $2.5 billion | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | $61.1 billion | $31.0 billion | $47.2 billion | $51.3 billion |
*Does not include a Senate level since a Senate FY26 State-Foreign Operations bill was never released
** Includes $2.5 billion in base emergency funding, which has not been made available because the Administration chose not to concur with Congress’s emergency designation.
***Reflects CBO’s re-estimate of the Administration’s request, which excludes some $20 billion in rescissions of previously appropriated funding assumed in the request but for which the Administration never provided Congress with specific proposals.
USGLC President & CEO Liz Schrayer lauded the bipartisan, bicameral deal on the National Security-State Department Appropriations bill as “an important statement that strategic investments in diplomacy and international assistance are central to America’s national security and economic interests, demonstrating how our nation wins in the world” and called for its swift approval.
The House approved the measure as part of a two-bill appropriations minibus on a strong bipartisan vote of 341-79. Prior to the vote on final passage, Members rejected an amendment (127-291) from Representative Eli Crane (R-AZ) that would have prohibited funds from being used to support the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and other democracy programs around the world – including support for the democratic opposition in Venezuela, freedom fighters in Iran, political prisoners in Cuba, and religious freedom in some of the world’s most repressive states. The bill was combined with a second minibus package that is slated for Senate consideration this week. However, growing concerns related to the Homeland Security Appropriations bill could complicate Senate passage – increasing the possibility of a partial government shutdown when the current Continuing Resolution expires.
Below is an analysis of notable international affairs programs and how they fared in FY26 compared to FY25 enacted levels. In general, this excludes emergency funding. However, it does take into account the $2.5 billion in FY25 emergency funding approved by Congress to cover base budget activities (referred to in this analysis as “base emergency” funding). The analysis below notes where the inclusion of this emergency funding impacts comparisons.
In terms of resources to support international peace and security, the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill largely sustains investments in security-oriented accounts.
International Security Assistance
The bill includes $8.9 billion for international security assistance, a $50 million (+1%) increase compared to the FY25 enacted level and $2.7 billion (+45%) above the Administration’s FY26 request. Of note:
Peacekeeping
The bill maintains funding for the Contributions to International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) account – which covers U.S. assessments for nine UN peacekeeping operations, including in South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo – essentially flat at the FY25 enacted level. This funding level is sufficient to cover the U.S. share of peacekeeping assessments up to the 25% statutory cap. Additionally, the bill authorizes the transfer of up to $466.5 million from the new National Security Investment Programs (NSIP) account for UN peacekeeping, if deemed necessary by the Secretary of State.
When it comes to non-UN peacekeeping missions, the bill reduces funding for the Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) account by $75 million (-18%) compared to the FY25 enacted level.
By comparison, under the Administration’s request, funding for UN peacekeeping would have been eliminated and funding for non-UN peacekeeping would have seen a severe 93% (-$380 million) cut.
| FY25 Enacted | FY26 Request | FY26 House | FY26 Conference | |
| UN Operations (CIPA) | $1.23 billion | $0 | $562 million | $1.23 billion |
| Non-UN Ops (PKO) | $410 million | $30 million | $410 million | $335 million |
| Total | $1.65 billion | $30 million | $973 million | $1.57 billion |
With America’s economic security top of mind for both Congress and the Administration, the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill strengthens investments in U.S. development finance and export agencies compared to their FY25 enacted levels. Of note:
Humanitarian Assistance
The final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill provides $5.5 billion for humanitarian assistance programs. While this is a significant 37% (-$3.2 billion) cut compared to the FY25 enacted level, it is also 37% (+$1.5 billion) above the Administration’s FY26 request.
The bill merges most humanitarian aid into a new State Department International Humanitarian Assistance (IHA) account – in line with the Administration’s FY26 request and reflecting the Administration’s dissolution of USAID, which historically has administered much of the U.S. government’s humanitarian assistance budget. Notably, the bill requires that no less than $2.97 billion in IHA funding be made available for disaster assistance programs.
| FY25 Enacted* | FY26 Request | FY26 House | FY26 Conference | |
| Disaster Assistance (IDA) | $4.78 billion | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| International Humanitarian Assistance (IHA) | $0 | $2.5 billion | $5.0 billion | $5.4 billion |
| Migration and Refugees (MRA) | $3.93 billion | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Emergency Refugees (ERMA) | $100,000 | $1.5 billion | $500 million | $100 million |
| Total | $8.71 billion | $4.0 billion | $5.5 billion | $5.5 billion |
When it comes to resources for long-term economic growth and development, the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill merges several accounts and makes significant reductions compared to FY25 enacted levels, although these cuts are far less severe than the Administration’s FY26 request. This merger, in part, reflects the Administration’s dissolution of USAID, which historically has administered a significant amount of the U.S. development assistance budget. Of note:
| FY25 Enacted* | FY26 Request | FY26 House | FY26 Conference | |
| A1OP | $0 | $2.89 billion | $0 | $0 |
| NSIP | $0 | $0 | $6.89 billion | $6.77 billion |
| Development Assistance (DA) | $3.93 billion | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Economic Support Fund (ESF) | $3.89 billion | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| AEECA | $770 million | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Democracy Fund | $345 million | $0 | $345 million | $205 million |
| MCC | $930 million | $224 million | $930 million | $830 million |
| Peace Corps | $431 million | $431 million | $411 million | $411 million |
In general, the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill sustains funding for global health – rejecting proposed deep cuts and highlighting strong bipartisan support in Congress for these programs. Specifically, the bill provides a total of $9.42 billion for State Department Global Health Programs – a $615 million (-6%) reduction compared to the FY25 enacted level. Of note:
| FY25 Enacted | FY26 Request | FY26 House | FY26 Conference | |
| Bilateral PEPFAR | $4.4 billion | $2.9 billion | $4.7 billion | $4.6 billion |
| Global Fund | $1.65 billion | $0 | $1.5 billion | $1.25 billion |
| USAID HIV/AIDS | $330 million | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Malaria | $795 million | $424 million | $800 million | $795 million |
| Tuberculosis | $395 million | $178 million | $395 million | $379 million |
| Maternal/Child Health | $915 million | $85 million | $915 million | $915 million |
| Vulnerable Children | $32 million | $0 | $33 million | $30 million |
| Nutrition | $165 million | $0 | $173 million | $165 million |
| Family Planning* | $608 million | $0 | $461 million** | $608 million |
| NTDs | $115 million | $0 | $115 million | $109 million |
| Global Health Security | $700 million | $200 million | NA | $616 million |
| Health Resilience Fund | $6 million | $0 | NA | $0 |
| Global Health Workers Initiative | $10 million | $0 | NA | $0 |
| Unallocated | $0 | $0 | $404 million | $0 |
| Total | $10.03 billion | $3.8 billion | $9.52 billion | $9.42 billion |
*State Department and USAID Global Health accounts only, except for family planning.
** Represents a cap on funding.
While the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill reduces investments in international institutions, it provides nearly full funding for the United Nations regular budget and UN peacekeeping operations – a significant improvement from previous proposals. Of note:
In recognition of the Administration’s comprehensive reorganization of America’s diplomatic and international assistance agencies and programs, the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill includes some restructuring and downsizing of America’s foreign policy workforce. Of note:
Below are details on select other funding and policy priorities included in the final FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill.
Congress completed action on the final FY26 Agriculture Appropriations bill in November as part of a comprehensive bipartisan agreement to end the historic 43-day government shutdown. While the final bill rejects the Administration’s proposal to zero out international food assistance funding in FY26, it does include some cuts. Specifically:
| FY25 Enacted | FY26 Request | FY26 House | FY26 Senate | FY26 Conference | |
| Food for Peace | $1.62 billion | $0 | $900 million | $1.5 billion | $1.2 billion |
| McGovern-Dole | $240 million | $0 | $220 million | $240 million | $240 million |
| Total | $1.86 billion | $0 | $1.12 billion | $1.74 billion | $1.44 billion |
Senate action on the final FY26 six-bill minibus – which includes the conferenced FY26 National Security-State Department Appropriations bill – remains uncertain due to concerns over the Homeland Security Appropriations bill. If the Senate fails to pass the minibus by midnight on January 30, a partial government shutdown will ensue.
As difficult and important conversations take place around funding for the Department of Homeland Security, time is of the essence to reach an agreement on a meaningful path forward that ensures final passage of the National Security-State Department Appropriations bill.
Once Congress completes its work on FY26 spending, Members will quickly have to turn their attention to the FY27 appropriations process – which could prove even more challenging. In addition to narrow majorities in both chambers, heightened partisanship and political tensions in a midterm election year make it likely that Congress will need to pass a stopgap Continuing Resolution (CR) to avoid a federal government shutdown when the current fiscal year ends on September 30 – punting spending decisions at least to the lame duck session or possibly into early 2027.
In the coming weeks and months, the USGLC looks forward to continuing to work with bipartisan Members of Congress in support of strategic investments in our international affairs tools to advance America’s national and economic security.
Download the account-by-account details here.