Blueprint for Effective International Assistance

Five Core Principles to Ensure America Wins and Five Approaches to Leave Behind


Explore the full Blueprint below – flip through the interactive pages to dive deeper into each recommendation.

Download PDF

 

At a moment of rising global threats and economic competition, there is broad agreement that effectiveness must be at the center of the future of U.S. international assistance.

For USGLC, that means a laser focus on the building blocks of effective assistance so it delivers results for the American people, advancing our nation’s economic and security interests.

Last year, USGLC’s “Blueprint for America to Win in the World” laid out practical ideas to ensure America’s civilian tools make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous. A year later – after a significant restructuring of U.S. international assistance – this is an important moment to take stock of what is working, where there are opportunities to embrace new approaches, and how we can leverage our nation’s unique strengths to win in the world.

This new “Blueprint for Effective International Assistance” advances this conversation by outlining Five Core Principles to build on – and Five Approaches to Leave Behind.

Core Principles for Effective International Assistance


Effective international assistance must advance America's security, economic strength, and values by delivering tangible benefits for the American people.

What Effective Assistance Should Deliver:

  • A safer America by addressing threats before they reach our shores.
  • A stronger American economy by opening markets and creating opportunities for U.S. workers and businesses.
  • Bolstered American competitiveness with China, Russia, and other rivals.
  • Reinforced U.S. leadership in ways that reduce the need for more costly military intervention or crisis responses.
  • Increased stability and a demonstration of American values through life-saving humanitarian assistance.

*See full report for Effectiveness in Action examples.

America’s private sector and ability to leverage private capital are among our nation’s greatest strategic assets. In developing countries, the private sector accounts for 60% of GDP, 80% of capital flows, and 90% of jobs. Effective U.S. assistance works alongside American businesses, investors, and entrepreneurs – and in collaboration with nonprofits and local partners – to achieve greater impact while reducing long-term reliance on U.S. government resources.

What Effective Assistance Should Deliver:

  • Unlocked private capital and investment alongside public resources.
  • Conditions for markets and businesses to grow.
  • Leverage that brings in the private sector’s expertise, technology, and operational efficiency.
  • Increased entrepreneurship, job creation, and long-term economic growth at home and around the world.

*See full report for Effectiveness in Action examples.

America's greatest advantage is the ability to bring American innovation and ingenuity to scale. Effective assistance harnesses American AI and technology platforms, science and research, and business expertise to strengthen our nation’s ability to compete and solve global challenges while creating benefits at home.

What Effective Assistance Should Deliver:

  • A crowding in of expertise of American universities, researchers, entrepreneurs, and innovators.
  • Ability to leverage AI to accelerate scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs to solve global challenges.
  • New opportunities for American industries and high-skilled jobs.
  • Solutions that improve lives abroad while strengthening U.S. competitiveness.

*See full report for Effectiveness in Action examples.

Effective international assistance should be guided by clear goals, measurable results, and strong accountability. Americans deserve confidence that taxpayer dollars are being spent wisely.

What Effective Assistance Should Deliver:

  • Clear objectives and outcomes – and measures of progress against them.
  • Measurable impact and the evidence and data to improve performance over time.
  • Rigorous oversight and accountability for taxpayer dollars.
  • Strategic planning and evaluation that ends, reforms, or scales programs based on demonstrated effectiveness.

*See full report for Effectiveness in Action examples.

Effective assistance should help countries become stable, capable partners – not permanent recipients of American assistance. Lasting success depends on shared responsibility among partner governments, allies, and local communities.

What Effective Assistance Should Deliver:

  • Partner countries with “skin in the game” that co-invest alongside the U.S. in their own success.
  • Strengthened local institutions and long-term capacity.
  • Shared responsibility among governments, allies, philanthropy, and the private sector.
  • A clear pathway toward greater self-reliance, localization, and eventual independence from assistance.

*See full report for Effectiveness in Action examples.

 

Approaches to Leave Behind


Effective assistance should be designed with a clear purpose and a path toward transition. American investments should help countries build the capacity and resources to sustain progress over time – not create dependency. The U.S. should also invest earlier where risks are more predictable, saving lives and money. For example, recent WFP research found that early response in Mali resulted in cost savings of up to 20% while limiting the impact of a crisis.

This Means:

  • Establishing clear objectives and benchmarks for what U.S. assistance is intended to achieve.
  • Investing early in resilience and preparedness – including proven early-warning tools like Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) – when more costly emergency responses can be anticipated and avoided.
  • Planning from the outset for transition, graduation, or an evolving U.S. role as conditions and capabilities improve.
  • Building the local capacity, institutions, and resources needed to sustain progress without indefinite U.S. support.

Effective assistance should have a clear connection to America's national interests and demonstrate how investments abroad contribute to our security and prosperity – and advance American values. Humanitarian response to disaster and conflict will always be an American priority, both to promote stability and save lives.

This Means:

  • Applying a U.S. national and economic security lens to decisions about where resources can have the greatest impact.
  • Addressing instability, disease, food insecurity, and other challenges to prevent greater threats and costs to Americans later.
  • Regularly evaluating whether programs continue to advance U.S. interests as circumstances and strategic priorities change.

Effective assistance should reinforce shared responsibility at every level and align on locally identified priorities and implementation. Donor countries should share the burden alongside the United States, while partner countries should demonstrate local leadership, invest their own resources, make necessary reforms, and have a stake in achieving results.

This Means:

  • Donor countries and other partners contributing alongside U.S. investments and sharing responsibility for addressing common challenges.
  • Partner governments demonstrating political commitment and investing their own resources alongside American assistance wherever feasible.
  • Designing programs that reflect both locally identified priorities and U.S. national interests.
  • Strengthening local institutions, markets, and expertise so countries can take increasing responsibility for achieving outcomes rather than creating parallel systems that depend indefinitely on outside support.

Effective assistance should bring the right U.S. government agencies, programs, and partners together around shared objectives – reducing duplication and making the best use of America's resources and expertise.

This Means:

  • Establishing clear priorities and roles across U.S. international assistance agencies to reduce bottlenecking and ensure programs reinforce rather than duplicate one another.
  • Breaking down barriers between economic development, diplomacy, trade, finance, and other tools of American engagement when greater coordination can deliver better results.
  • Sharing data, technology, expertise, and lessons learned across agencies and programs to improve decision-making and accountability.

Effective assistance means investing not only in programs but also in the people, partners, institutions, and infrastructure needed to implement programs effectively, strengthen monitoring and evaluation, and sustain progress. Where capacity is insufficient – inside or outside the government – it should be strengthened to ensure effective delivery of programs.

This Means:

  • Maintaining sufficient U.S. government expertise and capacity to design, oversee, and evaluate investments.
  • Working with capable and accountable implementing partners that can translate resources into results.
  • Strengthening basic infrastructure, local institutions, systems, and expertise so countries can increasingly implement, monitor, and sustain progress themselves.

EXPLORE PREVIOUS BLUEPRINTS


A Blueprint for America with Addendum
Blueprint Addendum
Stay updated! Follow us on X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, or join our email list.